Skip to content
Home
About
Posts
Case Law Reports
Home
About
Posts
Case Law Reports
Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog by Marco Sposini

Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog

by Marco Sposini

Laywer, Milan Bar Association

Worldwide debt recovery news


The ECJ on choice of court agreements under Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 in case of assignment of a claim arising from the contract

23 October 2025

The Court of Justice of the European Union, by judgment ECLI:EU:C:2025:827, dated 23 October 2025, in Case C‑682/23 – in proceedings between E.B. sp. z o.o. and K.P. sp. z o.o., two companies incorporated under Polish law, concerning the jurisdiction of the Romanian courts to hear an action brought by E.B. against K.P., the action having been brought before those courts on the basis of an agreement conferring jurisdiction that was concluded between K.P. and E. S.A., a company incorporated under Romanian law, which assigned to E.B. the claim forming the subject matter of that action – ruled that Article 25(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that a third party, as the assignee of a claim for damages arising from the non-performance of a contract containing a jurisdiction clause, may rely on that clause vis-à-vis the original contracting party, as the assigned debtor of that claim, under the same conditions as those under which the other original party to the contract could have relied on that clause against that debtor, for the purposes of an action for recovery of that claim and without the consent of that debtor, in a situation where, in accordance with the national law applicable to that contract, as interpreted by the national case-law, an assignment of a claim entails a transfer, to the assignee’s assets, not only of the right of claim, but also of the rights attached to that claim, including the right to rely on the application of an agreement conferring jurisdiction set out in that contract, unless the original parties to the contract have expressly agreed that that clause cannot be relied on against them in the event of assignment, to a third party, of a claim arising from that contract.

The text is available here


Post navigation

Previous Previous
Article on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Uzbekistan
NextContinue
Article on choice of court and arbitration agreements in the United States

Disclaimer

This blog is my private project and represents only my personal views and opinions. It is not supported, sponsored or endorsed by my law firm, Studio Legale Sardo, or any other third party. This blog is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Using the blog and contacting me through this website does not make the user my client. This blog does not provide legal advice but only general information and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice by a qualified lawyer in your jurisdiction.

© 2023-2026 Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog by Marco Sposini. All Rights Reserved

VAT Number IT13173280150

info@crossborderdebtrecoveryblog.com

Cookie Policy    Privacy Policy

Scroll to top