Skip to content
Home
About
Posts
Case Law Reports
Home
About
Posts
Case Law Reports
Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog by Marco Sposini

Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog

by Marco Sposini

Laywer, Milan Bar Association

Worldwide debt recovery news


The Court of Justice on Articles 62(1), 4(1) and 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 and Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 1784/2020

17 May 2024

The Court of Justice of the European Union, by judgment ECLI:EU:C:2024:405, dated 16 May 2024, in Case C‑222/23 – in proceedings seeking the issue of an order for payment, brought by ‘Toplofikatsia Sofia’ EAD, a thermal energy supplier, against V.Z.A., a debtor customer, for a sum of money corresponding to the value of the heating supplied for that customer’s apartment in Sofia (Bulgaria) – ruled that:

1) Article 62(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation under which nationals of a Member State who reside in another Member State are deemed to be domiciled at an address which remains at all times registered in the first Member State.

2) Article 4(1) and Article 5(1) of Regulation No 1215/2012 must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, as interpreted in national caselaw, from conferring on a court of a Member State jurisdiction to issue an order for payment against a debtor in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she was domiciled, on the date on which the application for an order for payment was made, in the territory of another Member State, in situations other than those provided for in Sections 2 to 7 of Chapter II of that regulation.

3) Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2020/1784 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents) must be interpreted as not precluding a court of a Member State, which has jurisdiction to issue an order for payment against a debtor where there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is domiciled in the territory of another Member State, from seeking assistance from the competent authorities of that other Member State and using the means it makes available to identify the debtor’s address for service of that order for payment.

The text is available here


Post navigation

Previous Previous
Article on the Vienna Convention 1980
NextContinue
Article on the Vienna Convention 1980

Disclaimer

This blog is my private project and represents only my personal views and opinions. It is not supported, sponsored or endorsed by my law firm, Studio Legale Sardo, or any other third party. This blog is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Using the blog and contacting me through this website does not make the user my client. This blog does not provide legal advice but only general information and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice by a qualified lawyer in your jurisdiction.

© 2023-2026 Cross-border Debt Recovery Blog by Marco Sposini. All Rights Reserved

VAT Number IT13173280150

info@crossborderdebtrecoveryblog.com

Cookie Policy    Privacy Policy

Scroll to top